Standard Process Organic Farming vs. Designs for Health Non-GMO Standards: What Practitioners Need to Know

Standard Process
Standard Process Organic Farming vs. Designs for Health Non-GMO Standards: What Practitioners Need to Know

Standard Process operates a single-source certified organic farm in Wisconsin (since 1929) for the bulk of its plant ingredients, while Designs for Health emphasizes non-GMO sourcing and third-party testing across a broader supplier network. Both meet practitioner-grade quality standards — but they earn that quality through different supply-chain philosophies.

Quick Reference

Sourcing Philosophy Comparison

StandardStandard ProcessDesigns for Health
SourceSingle farm, WisconsinMulti-supplier, non-GMO emphasis
Certified organicYes (farm)Selective
Third-party testingIn-house + select 3PAggressive 3P
Form factorWhole-food matrixStandardized isolate

Why Both Approaches Are Valid

Vertical integration (Standard Process) gives end-to-end control. Multi-supplier sourcing with rigorous testing (Designs for Health) gives selection breadth and bench-tested potency. Patients judge by outcomes, not supply chains — and SupplementPractice.com tracks outcomes per brand for the practitioner.

Clinical & Technical References

Grow a Smarter Practice

Replace outdated systems with a HIPAA-compliant platform that helps you manage patients, build protocols faster, and integrate every major supplement brand — Standard Process, Xymogen, Metagenics, Designs for Health, Gaia Herbs PRO, Food Research — into one workflow.

Start Free Trial →